In the Terminator films, Skynet, a computer program that controls nearly the whole world in the future, sends a machine to the past in order to kill John Connor, the future leader of the human resistance, at different points of his life: once before he is conceived (by killing his mother, Sarah Connor). In The Terminator, the machines send the T-101 and the humans send Kyle Reese: the first will give the people in the past the necessary components that will end up starting the Skynet project, and Kyle will be John Connor's father (that is, if the time travel hadn't happened then Skynet wouldn't have been created and John Connor wouldn't have been born).
A predestination paradox (also called causal loop, causality loop, and (less frequently) closed loop or closed time loop) is a paradox of time travel. It exists when a time traveler is caught in a loop of events that "predestines" or "predates" them to travel back in time. Because of the possibility of influencing the past while time traveling, one way of explaining why history does not change is by saying that whatever has happened must happen. A time traveler attempting to alter the past in this model, intentionally or not, would only be fulfilling their role in creating history as we know it, not changing it. Or that the time-traveler's personal knowledge of history already includes their future travels to their own experience of the past.
Terminator 2: Judgment Day, commonly abbreviated as T2, is set ten years after the events of The Terminator, it follows Sarah Connor, her 10-year-old son John, and a reprogrammed Terminator from the future as they defend themselves from a T-1000 and attempt to prevent Judgment Day, a future event in which machines will begin to exterminate humanity. The surviving arm and CPU chip of the original Terminator was analyzed and found that the technology was so advanced, they (humans) would have never invented the technology themselves and was used to create Skynet in the first place, suggesting a second predestination paradox.
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines does somewhat negate any paradox by showing that the American military have secretly developed the technology independently, suggesting that Skynet was always developed this way and not from the arm of the T-101.
The predestination paradox of the Terminator movies neatly resolve the grandfather paradox by suggesting that time lines inevitably collapse into one sustainable sequence. Unlike a grandfather paradox, where each event negates the other, in a predestination paradox each event is dependent on the other. This avoids the logical pitfalls of the grandfather paradox because once both events occur, the timeline is complete.
An interesting aspect of the "loop" is that the initial events that gave rise to the loop need not be in the final loop. For instance, maybe the original Terminator timeline had no John Connor at all--instead Earth's savior was a man named "Ron Steadman" and initially the Terminators were sent back to kill him. The humans send Kyle Reese back to save Ron, and along the way he impregnates Sarah Connor and she gives birth to John Connor--who now becomes a greater hero than Ron and the target of Skynet's attack in the new timeline. Thus, Kyle Reese is now sent back to save John instead of Ron (who is forgotton) and the 'movie timeline' is born despite its seemingly trigerless series of events.
Another interesting possibility is that somethings have to happen--like the birth of Skynet. Since Skynet can manipulate time, it can send parts of itself back in time and thus will its own creation into a past where it otherwise would not exist. The terrifying implication of this is that if Skynet exists in one timeline it can put itself in all timelines; making it a truly unbeatable opponent. Alternatively, T3 suggests that Skynet must exist not because it sent itself back in time but because its creation is a necessary product of human nature--an invention as inevitable as the wheel. Either way, The Terminator series suggests a creative solution to the grandfather paradox: a 'guided' time travel where some events must or must not occur to create a cohesive timeline.
I haven't thought this through yet, but I wanted to mention something regarding causal loops in the Terminator series...
ReplyDeleteIn each movie, "Judgment Day" is on a different day, meaning that the time traveler who goes back in time to try to change the course of history does in fact change the course of history. I don't remember the exact timelines, but Kyle Reese successfully stops (or *SPOILER ALERT LULLUZ* delays, as the case may be) Judgment Day from occurring sometime in the early nineties. The reprogrammed Arnold in T2 successfully stops Judgment day from occurring sometime in the late nineties/early 2000's. Arnold in T3 stops the sexy fembot from terminating John Connor, but Judgment Day is finally realized (I believe it was 2004).
Now, the question is, which timeline did these time travelers come from? Kyle Reese is from a timeline where Judgment Day occurred in the early nineties (perhaps a timeline where there was no time traveling Kyle Reese). What about the T2 Arnold? It's indicated in the movie (if I remember correctly) that T2 Arnold hails from the timeline where Kyle Reese travels back in time to save Sarah Connor, makes bam bam with her and temporarily saves the world from Judgment Day (and NOT from the timeline where Kyle Reese wears a condom when he makes the sexy time with Sarah Connor).
I think the point I'm trying to make here is that this isn't necessarily a causal loop; at least not in a strictly defined way. That is, while the sequence of some events or the occurrence of certain events are inevitable, when they occur is flexible in the Terminator universe. If Judgment Day changes, then I think we must all agree that they are distinct timelines (even if the sequence of SOME events are the same, the sequence of ALL events--even at the atomic or quantum level--necessarily cannot be the same if they occur at different points in time). &Note: I'm equating events to states here, which are ultimately the same thing. I'm also taking "time" to be defined by changing of states of the universe... if that makes sense at all.
In my opinion, it's better to think of each Terminator movie as a separate timeline (starting from before T1 such that Pre-T1 is 1 timeline, T1 is a second timeline, T2 is a third and so on). The moment that the first molecules of Kyle Reese's body from the pre-T1 timeline is manifested in T1 timeline, the T1 timeline was born (not at some determinate time, but in a metaphysical sense: T1 timeline exists by virtue of Kyle Reese's entering into it--the essential element that distinguishes pre-T1 timeline from T1 timeline). Likewise, T2 exists by virtue of T1000's entering its timeline, and so on for T3 timeline.
Okay, I'm just babbling randomly now, but all of this would be moot IFF Kyle Reese (in T4, I was really fucked up so I don't really remember) really believed that Judgment Day occurred on the date specified in Terminator 1, and he absolutely had no idea that he himself was John Connor's father (I vaguely recall in T4 that John Connor didn't want Kyle to know this).
Anyway, I think that Judgment Day occurring on different dates mandates that the time travelers (Kyle Reese, Arnold's) are from different timelines than their destinations'. Of course, this is not to say that the Kyle Reese and Arnold's from the new timelines are not to travel back in time, but only that they would be traveling back in time in a different timeline.
Judgment Day wasn't delayed in T1, it wasn't until T2 that the timeline was altered. As far as I remember, T3 didn't alter the timeline either so we only have two timelines: pre and post T2.
ReplyDeleteAnother interesting question is if the Terminator series depicts a "many worlds" universe, then why is Skynet going back in time at all? it will never reap the benefits of its assassination schemes because they'll all play out in different time line. The equally frightening implication is that Skynet isn't trying to just conquer its universe but ALL universes. Which means even the all Amish universe is vulnerable to attack despite never developing artificial intelligence because Skynet could just send itself into it from a universe in which it was created....
ReplyDeleteAsking "why does Skynet go back at all since they don't reap any of the benefits" is a whole new question.
ReplyDeleteFirst, I want to explore a single timeline scenario. If we accept that everything is a single timeline (there is no distinction between pre-T2 and post-T2 timelines), then we have to ask how T2 Arnold can come from a timeline that is seemingly a pre-T2 timeline when in fact there is no pre-T2 timeline--that is, the course of events that leads to T2 Arnold's existence does not necessitate T2 Arnold's traveling back in time. Here, if we say that there is only a single timeline, then we run into this paradox. &Note: If T2 Arnold came from a post-T2 timeline, then it would all make sense. &Note2: And again, this would be all moot if T2 Arnold gave a made up history of the future (lol?), in which case it is very possible that T2 Arnold's time travel is a part of its own history (and thus, the causal loop).
Now, if we adopt the "many worlds" interpretation, how/why/if traveling back in time benefits Skynet is a question that can only be answered after we work out all of the intricacies of such interpretations. Also, I think that this interpretation is the only one that is coherent with the Terminator series, since the T2 Arnold would otherwise never exist if T2 Arnold went back in time to prevent its own existence (yeah yeah, even if T2 Arnold ONLY delayed Judgment Day, it's technically impossible for that very same T2 Arnold to be built[I don't mean same specs or model or whatever, but that very instantiation]).
Another thought is that perhaps Skynet is trying to help out its alternate universe brethren Skynets by sending Terminators to terminate the resistance that they would otherwise face. If they can't secure their own future in their own timeline, perhaps they secure their brethrens' futures in other timelines (who may perhaps reciprocate the help? I dunno). Maybe the limitations of jumping timelines are that it could only enter timelines in a world that timeline jumping is possible/inevitable. I don't know, I would think only a massive super-intelligent system like Skynet or Google could comprehend all of this at the moment.
Oh and I just wanted to clarify that I'm not saying that a causal loop is impossible. It could very well be the case that travelling back in time is a requisite for time travelling in the future. Of course, this leads to the question of how this loop came to be in the first place (only thing I could think of is that this always "was," and there was no unique event that triggered this loop).
ReplyDeleteEach time a Terminator or human is sent back in time, they affect that reality and create a new one. A predestination paradox or grandfather loop can never occur, as none of the other realities (including the original) are affected.
ReplyDeleteHowever, because each new reality/timeline builds upon the previous ones and are separate, there can never be a predestination paradox or grandfather loop. There is simply the appearance of an effect resolving/supporting the original cause.
This is best described using the analogy of file copying on the computer: The copy of the file mimics the original, including the name and content. However, this file will have a different date/time stamp, and the content may be modified later. Even when left unmodified, it remains unique.
All Terminator movies exist on different timelines, so the future (and even past) is subject to change with further installments.